I recently had a Twitter conversation with a researcher from the Netherlands who was reiterating the importance of using research to guide practice. He pointed me to this journal article from the mid-90s, which raises concern over educators who have a tendency to use preference to guide their practice, even if their preferences defy research. The paper identifies this as both (understandably) problematic and (surprisingly?) common.
This brings to mind a relatively recent article from the Edmonton Journal. Ever since this debacle a few years ago, Edmonton media does a great job of portraying this part of the country as a hotspot of poor assessment practices. I hope that there is a disconnect between the reports of the media and the actual practice being employed in classrooms there, but their local media sure seem to have a love affair with promoting practice that is based primarily on preference and that laughs in the face of research. It tends to paint such practice as bold, brave, and desirable. Equally as concerning are the public comments which further support such preference-driven practice while bashing research. I find this “if it feels good it must be good” approach to be troubling. Why does statistical data not have a more prominent role in determining what happens in our schools? Why is so much left to preference? (As an aside, I do realize that statistical data can be taken to the extreme and used in places where it doesn’t apply. Particularly when dealing with people, not everyone fits into typical statistics and I’m aware of that. I’m looking forward to reading this book for more on that topic).
It’s tough to stay on top of the research. There is so much to know and limited time to learn. Educators have a never-ending stream of tasks to be done in any given day, and sifting through journals to find information pertinent to our individual areas of desired growth is a nice wish but not a reality for any educators I’ve ever met. Not to mention that for many (most?) people, sifting through journal articles doesn’t make it into the “ways I enjoy spending my time” category. Even if it was something a particular teacher enjoyed, Hardiman et al. point out that “teachers do not typically possess the background knowledge that is necessary to parse research articles and apply findings in appropriate contexts”(p.136). And yet, despite the difficulties that are inherent in being wise consumers of research who use research to inform and drive our practice, I firmly believe that we can do more; we can do better. There simply must be a way.
Twitter has become such a tool for me, (read more about how I use Twitter for my professional development here), but it has its limitations too. Twitter can become a venue for groupthink or a means of propagating preference-based practice if opinions are left unchecked. With the right connections and knowledge of where to look it can, thankfully, also be a sharing space for research. Unfortunately the latter is more difficult to find. There are opinions aplenty but sharing of research among educators seems to be a much less common occurrence.
I’m not sure exactly what this means for educators in general, but I do have some ideas of what I’d like it to mean for me. I’d like research to take a more dominant role in my practice. Not the “I think I read it in a book somewhere so I’ll defend my practice by prefacing my conversation with generic ‘research says'”kind of research (oh, I’m guilty of using that tactic!), but the more authentic “these researchers in this study in this year found these findings and this is the conclusion that I’m drawing from that” kind of research.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think that’s the answer for everyone. I think that most of us, certainly, could benefit from having an increased general awareness of education-related research data and we could be more intentional in sharing that data and in using that data to drive our practice, but I think there’s room for variation in specifically how that looks from one person to the next. Could we each agree, however, to be a little more intentional in reading, finding, and sharing data that can inform our practice? I’m willing to venture a guess that the results of this would be noteworthy. After all, ‘research says’.